Parcel environmental use-restriction and institutional-control status
What recorded environmental covenants, deed notices, activity-and-use limitations, environmental easements, or land- or groundwater-use restrictions apply at or near this parcel, and what effective, current, lifted, or termination dates are reported?
The data that answers it
Ranked by fit · best firstThe South Carolina Brownfields layer explicitly reports restrictive-covenant type and filing date for parcel-reachable voluntary-cleanup contract records.
ADEQ’s public queryable DEUR/VEMUR layer exposes distinct raw USE_RESTRICTION values for “DEUR - Institutional Control” and “VEMUR - Institutional Control,” plus land-use restriction text, recorded document number and date, site and place status, closure and end dates, address, coordinates, and remediation-document links. It reports recorded environmental use restrictions while active or closed site labels do not independently establish legal enforceability.
The ISRA Source reports raw deed-notice and Classification Exception Area statuses with filed, established, or lifted dates and parcel-reachable case identity.
Florida DEP’s public statewide Institutional Controls Registry reports contaminated sites subject to recorded deed restrictions, covenants, or use restrictions and exposes control-boundary mechanism types, instrument references, effective dates, restriction text, site identity and address, and geometry. A documented parcel intersection or stated-distance match identifies the reported restriction; registry presence does not prove enforceability, present contamination, compliance, or suitability.
The statewide polygon layer publishes recorded environmental restrictive covenants and deed notices with institutional-control type, control methods, restriction coverage, recording date, raw status, regulatory programme, contaminants, programme-document URL, site address, and geometry. It directly identifies which recorded restriction intersects an arbitrary matched parcel while preserving the published polygon and spatial-match method.
The re-evaluation Source reports raw deed-notice and groundwater-control statuses with filed, established, or lifted dates and parcel-reachable case identity.
The Known Contaminated Sites layer reports deed-notice and Classification Exception Area statuses and dates for identified geocoded sites.
The Source reports raw DEED_NOTICE and DN_DATE values plus Classification Exception Area groundwater-control values in CEA, CEA_DATE, and CEA_VIC for parcel-reachable identified closed cases. Raw records must be preserved without inferring current enforceability, legal effect, or suitability.
The statewide VRP property export identifies properties carrying institutional-control codes and provides property identity, address and coordinates, raw restriction codes, programme status, and closure date. It reports whether an institutional or activity-and-use restriction is recorded for a matched property; programme status and closure date must not be translated into legal enforceability.
The official determination layer reports whether an environmental covenant is included and whether the issued document was recorded in land records; covenant signing, recording, and termination dates; liber and folio references; groundwater-use restrictions; other restriction notes; and restricted or unrestricted residential, commercial, industrial, and recreational-use tiers. This directly supplies recorded environmental institutional-control and use-restriction evidence with instrument dates and parcel/site identity.
NJDEP’s statewide remediation layer reports Deed Notice status and filed date, groundwater Classification Exception Area status and date, case and site identity, and parcel identifiers. It directly reports which land- or groundwater-use institutional control affects a focal parcel and whether NJDEP reports it as ongoing or lifted; preserve the raw status and date and do not infer enforceability, contamination, or compliance.
The public SARR product is filtered to South Carolina cleanup sites with restrictive covenants or other activity-and-use limitations and publishes restrictive_covenant_type, restrictive_covenant_date_filed, programme and status, contaminants, acreage, address, and coordinates. It directly reports whether and what environmental covenant or use limitation is recorded at the site; programme status does not prove continuing enforceability.
Show 18 more sources+−
The statewide governmental full-file extract identifies institutional controls through raw control_type and control_detail and reports remediation programme, corrective-action status, filed date, site identity, address, and coordinates. It directly supplies official evidence of a recorded environmental restriction; filed or roster presence must not be interpreted as current enforceability without supporting status.
Georgia’s statewide UECA property list identifies properties subject to recorded environmental covenants, supplies source-specific restrictive codes, and links the governing covenant document.
The statewide queryable layer is filtered to hazardous sites with a LandUseRestriction value and reports the restriction value, site identity and location, site status, closure date, contamination context, and a supporting document link. It directly establishes regulator-recorded restriction presence and available status/date context for a focal parcel or stated-distance match; closure date does not prove continuing legal effectiveness.
MassDEP’s statewide AUL layer identifies contaminated sites with recorded Activity and Use Limitations restricting future property use and supplies site identity, address, location, AUL date, response-action class, and raw status. It does not prove current enforceability, compliance, or suitability.
The Pennsylvania AUL Registry identifies Act 2 remediation sites with recorded environmental covenants imposing institutional or engineering controls and supplies an AUL identifier, site identity, address, and point location. It establishes recorded AUL presence but not comprehensive instrument terms or current or lifted status absent those fields.
BCP rows carry typed institutional controls with decoded values including easement, deed restriction, notice, and decision document; control lifecycle dates remain unknown.
HW rows carry typed institutional controls with decoded values and programme/site identity; current enforceability and control-specific lifecycle dates remain unknown.
NYSDEC’s public remediation dataset reports institutional-control codes including Environmental Easement, Legacy Control (deed restriction), and Administrative Control, together with programme, site identity, address and location, site class, and project completion date. It identifies recorded institutional-control type at or near a parcel; project completion date is not the instrument effective, lifted, or termination date.
The documented MGP heuristic returns typed institutional-control rows with deed-restriction, easement, and notice values; current enforceability and lifecycle dates remain unknown.
The SARR state-cleanup output reports restrictive-covenant type and filing date for parcel-reachable sites with programme and raw case/master status.
VCP rows carry typed institutional controls with decoded deed-restriction and environmental-easement values; current enforceability and lifecycle dates remain unknown.
The South Carolina product reports restrictive-covenant type and filing date with site/case identity, address/coordinates, programme, and raw case status.
ADEQ records raw land-use restriction values including 'DEUR (IC)' with restriction-recorded date, site identity, site status, acceptance date, and closure date.
The statewide HSI subset identifies Class III and IV hazardous sites cleaned to restricted or non-residential standards with institutional controls and reports site identity, HSI class, and risk-reduction standard. It supplies coarse evidence that a matched site is in a restricted-cleanup or institutional-control category, but not the exact instrument, terms, recording date, current or lifted status, or enforceability.
The statewide completed-Act-2 extract is filtered to sites marked as having an activity-and-use limitation and supplies facility identity, location, and approval date. It establishes reported AUL presence and timing context, but not detailed instrument terms, current enforceability, or lift status.
The public project layer identifies projects with a LURU_Link, reports status 'Recorded' with Status_Date, and links a project-specific LURU document. It supports recorded LURU presence, recorded date, and document retrieval, but does not separately encode lifted or termination status.
The site-aggregated NFR product reports whether any NFR letter identifies an institutional control and distinguishes industrial/commercial restriction, groundwater-use restriction, ordinance, worker caution, slab-on-grade, highway-authority agreement, BCT, ELUC groundwater-use restriction, and other control indicators. LatestLandUse is specifically taken from the latest NFR letter and can be read with LatestNfrLetterDate. This supplies official remediation-related restriction/control presence and type, but not land-record instrument identity, title enforceability, continuing current status, lift, or termination dates; the other any-letter indicators cannot be tied to a particular letter date after aggregation.
Virginia DEQ’s statewide VRP export identifies listed sites carrying a recorded deed, land-use, or groundwater-use restriction. It supports restriction-presence screening for a matched VRP site, but does not substantiate exact terms, current or lifted status, or effective or termination dates; those values remain unknown.
Related questions
Under Parcel environmental contamination and remediation statusNeed Parcel environmental use-restriction and institutional-control status answered at scale?
We will test these sources on your own records, show you match and fill rates, then handle the contract, security review, and delivery into your stack.